As a Starbucks customer, I'm concerned about your opposition to Ethiopia's right to own its coffee names. I am asking Starbucks to honor its commitment to farmers by signing an agreement with Ethiopia that recognizes the country's rights to the names of its coffees. If Starbucks and other companies sign such agreements, estimates suggest that Ethiopian's could see up to $88 million of extra income a year.
Ethiopia ranks among the poorest countries in the world; more than 25 percent of its population lives on less than $1 per day. About 15 million people in Ethiopia depend on coffee to make a living, the majority of them growing their crop on small plots of about two and a half acres.
Meanwhile, coffee lovers pay up to $26 per pound for fine Ethiopian coffees because they're willing to pay for high quality and great taste. Ethiopian farmers, however, often earn just 5-10 percent of the retail value.
With this disparity in mind, the Ethiopian government launched a project to get legal ownership of its fine coffee names - Sidamo, Yirgacheffe, and Harar. By owning the names, Ethiopia will be able to occupy a stronger negotiating position with foreign buyers, capture a larger share of the market value associated with those names, and protect the reputations of its brand names. In a country with a per capita income of around $100 per year, that amount of money could have a profound impact on the lives of millions of Ethiopians.
As you know, Ethiopia approached Starbucks more than a year ago asking the company to lead by example and to discuss an agreement that would acknowledge Ethiopia's ownership of these names. So far, Starbucks has refused to sign the agreement, or even talk seriously about it with the Ethiopian government.
I want to see Starbucks do the right thing by the poor farmers who grow its coffee. I urge you to sign the licensing agreement and recognize Ethiopia's rightful ownership of its coffee names.
Signed by:
[Your name]
[Your address]
Please sign the petition
News and views on Ethiopia's finest specialty coffees - Sidamo, Harar, Yirgacheffe and Others
Tell Starbucks to Give Ethiopian Farmers Their Fair Share (Media Rights)
Each year, coffee companies make billions of dollars. Starbucks alone earned almost $5.8 billion in net revenues during the first three quarters of 2006.
With as many as 15 million Ethiopians dependent on coffee, Ethiopia has decided to get its farmers more of what they deserve. The country's government has asked Starbucks to sign a licensing agreement that will allow Ethiopia to control the names of its coffees. That way, Ethiopia can help determine an export price that makes sure farmers see a larger share of the profits enabling them to feed their children, send them to school and get them better healthcare.
Oxfam and a coalition of allies are asking Starbucks to sign this agreement. According to one coalition member, control of the name brands could increase Ethiopia's coffee export income by $88 million annually. This money could go a long way to help lift millions of Ethiopians out of poverty.
So please, help us convince Starbucks to sign this agreement with Ethiopia. Poor farmers deserve a fair share of the profits.
http://act.oxfamamerica.org/campaign/starbucks_petition
Starts
Ends
Issues
Economic Justice, International, Labor, Agriculture, Africa
Homepage
act.oxfamamerica.org
Contact
Posted on December 5, 2006 in Event / Call to action by leahs
With as many as 15 million Ethiopians dependent on coffee, Ethiopia has decided to get its farmers more of what they deserve. The country's government has asked Starbucks to sign a licensing agreement that will allow Ethiopia to control the names of its coffees. That way, Ethiopia can help determine an export price that makes sure farmers see a larger share of the profits enabling them to feed their children, send them to school and get them better healthcare.
Oxfam and a coalition of allies are asking Starbucks to sign this agreement. According to one coalition member, control of the name brands could increase Ethiopia's coffee export income by $88 million annually. This money could go a long way to help lift millions of Ethiopians out of poverty.
So please, help us convince Starbucks to sign this agreement with Ethiopia. Poor farmers deserve a fair share of the profits.
http://act.oxfamamerica.org/campaign/starbucks_petition
Starts
Ends
Issues
Economic Justice, International, Labor, Agriculture, Africa
Homepage
act.oxfamamerica.org
Contact
Posted on December 5, 2006 in Event / Call to action by leahs
Talks between Starbucks and the Ethiopian Government Positive and Ongoing (CSR Wire)
(CSRwire) SEATTLE--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 30, 2006--This week Starbucks ceo Jim Donald and his executive team had positive meetings with African coffee farmers, producers and government officials in Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda and Ethiopia. In particular during the meetings in Ethiopia, Starbucks and government officials discussed the government's initiative to protect its specialty coffee names. The parties used these meetings as the first step in developing a solution. Starbucks fully supports the premise that any protection of specialty coffee names in Ethiopia should benefit Ethiopian coffee farmers.
"We were grateful for the opportunity to meet with the Ethiopian Prime Minister Melese Zenawi to talk about how we can work together on initiatives that will benefit coffee farmers," said Jim Donald, Starbucks president and ceo. "We believe the meeting was very cooperative and productive and we are committed to working with the Ethiopian government to find a solution that supports the Ethiopian coffee farmer."
As stated in the press release issued on Nov. 29, 2006 by the Ethiopian Intellectual Property Office, "both parties agreed to cooperate and work together in the protection and use of the Intellectual Property Rights of Ethiopia's specialty coffee names and for Starbucks to promote high quality Ethiopian coffees."
For more detailed information about Starbucks relationship with Ethiopian coffee farmers, please visit http://www.starbucks.com/aboutus/pressdesc.asp?id=713.http://www.businesswire.com/cnn/sbux.shtml
"We were grateful for the opportunity to meet with the Ethiopian Prime Minister Melese Zenawi to talk about how we can work together on initiatives that will benefit coffee farmers," said Jim Donald, Starbucks president and ceo. "We believe the meeting was very cooperative and productive and we are committed to working with the Ethiopian government to find a solution that supports the Ethiopian coffee farmer."
As stated in the press release issued on Nov. 29, 2006 by the Ethiopian Intellectual Property Office, "both parties agreed to cooperate and work together in the protection and use of the Intellectual Property Rights of Ethiopia's specialty coffee names and for Starbucks to promote high quality Ethiopian coffees."
For more detailed information about Starbucks relationship with Ethiopian coffee farmers, please visit http://www.starbucks.com/aboutus/pressdesc.asp?id=713.http://www.businesswire.com/cnn/sbux.shtml
‘Unethical Starbucks to lose customers’
Addis Ababa – United States coffee giant Starbucks’ row with Ethiopia entered a new dimension after an Oxford academic said its unethical behaviour would make it lose face with its educated middle-class customers.
Douglas Holt, the L’Oréal Professor of Marketing at Oxford University’s Saïd Business School, said the coffee house’s “rash attempt to shut down Ethiopia’s [trademark] applications” would hurt the ethical brand the company has tried to create.
Ethiopia had applied to trademark its most famous coffee names, Sidamo, Harar and Yirgacheffe, to enable it to capture more value from trade, control their use and allow farmers to receive a greater share of the retail price.
Last month charity group Oxfam said that Starbucks’ attempts to derail the application, by asking the National Coffee Association of USA Inc. to oppose approval of the trademarks, could deny producers an estimated £47mn (about $88.5mn) a year. It added that Ethiopian farmers earn as little as $0.75 for a pound of beans, which Starbucks earned up to $26 a pound for.
Holt said that Starbucks’ unethical blocking of the application would lose the company more than any rise in prices as customers switched brands. However, convenience would probably make this unlikely.
Starbucks has denied that it was attempting to influence the application, but said that trademarks were not the best way to help growers and that a kind of certification should be employed instead.
However the director-general of the Ethiopian Intellectual Property Office, Getachew Mengistie, said that Addis Ababa had found trademarks were more likely to strengthen the position of farmers to enable them to earn a fair price for their efforts.
Starbucks’ chief executive Jim Donald was allegedly preparing to meet with Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi. The two would sit as almost equals. Ethiopia’s GDP was $11.2bn, while Starbucks’ annual revenues sat at $7.8bn. -Business in Africa Online
Douglas Holt, the L’Oréal Professor of Marketing at Oxford University’s Saïd Business School, said the coffee house’s “rash attempt to shut down Ethiopia’s [trademark] applications” would hurt the ethical brand the company has tried to create.
Ethiopia had applied to trademark its most famous coffee names, Sidamo, Harar and Yirgacheffe, to enable it to capture more value from trade, control their use and allow farmers to receive a greater share of the retail price.
Last month charity group Oxfam said that Starbucks’ attempts to derail the application, by asking the National Coffee Association of USA Inc. to oppose approval of the trademarks, could deny producers an estimated £47mn (about $88.5mn) a year. It added that Ethiopian farmers earn as little as $0.75 for a pound of beans, which Starbucks earned up to $26 a pound for.
Holt said that Starbucks’ unethical blocking of the application would lose the company more than any rise in prices as customers switched brands. However, convenience would probably make this unlikely.
Starbucks has denied that it was attempting to influence the application, but said that trademarks were not the best way to help growers and that a kind of certification should be employed instead.
However the director-general of the Ethiopian Intellectual Property Office, Getachew Mengistie, said that Addis Ababa had found trademarks were more likely to strengthen the position of farmers to enable them to earn a fair price for their efforts.
Starbucks’ chief executive Jim Donald was allegedly preparing to meet with Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi. The two would sit as almost equals. Ethiopia’s GDP was $11.2bn, while Starbucks’ annual revenues sat at $7.8bn. -Business in Africa Online
Ethiopian coffee trademark dispute may leave Starbucks with nasty taste (The Times)
Madeleine Acey, Enterprise Editor, Times Online
Academic warns American chain that customers will go elsewhere if it places profit before ethics
Starbucks was accused yesterday of “playing Russian roulette” with its brand as a row over prices for Ethiopian coffee farmers intensified.
As an Oxford academic lambasted the American coffee shops chain, Jim Donald, Starbucks’ chief executive, was preparing to visit Ethiopia tomorrow for talks with Meles Zenawi, its Prime Minister, The Times has learnt.
Douglas Holt, the L’Oréal Professor of Marketing at Oxford University’s Saïd Business School, accused Starbucks of hypocrisy and abuse of power and said that the company was in danger of damaging its name among its educated middle-class customers by opposing Addis Ababa’s attempts to trademark Ethiopia’s coffee varieties in the United States.
The international coffee chain had worked hard to cultivate a progressive image, selling fair trade and “ethical” products and promoting sustainable development among the poorest coffee-growers, he said.
“In their rash attempt to shut down Ethiopia’s applications, [Starbucks] have placed the Starbucks brand in significant peril. Starbucks customers will be shocked by the disconnect between their current perceptions of Starbucks’ ethics and the company’s actions against Ethiopia,” he said.
He claimed that Starbucks’ stance was likely to hit profits much harder than any price rises brought about by trademarking.
Oxfam said last month that the Ethiopian growers selling to Starbucks earned between 75 cents and $1.60 a pound on beans that Starbucks sold at up to $26 (£13.40) a pound. The aid organisation issued a strongly worded statement accusing Starbucks of actively blocking Ethiopia’s trademark bid.
Starbucks, in turn, denied this and issued a statement demanding that Oxfam stop its attack. Oxfam took out full-page advertisements on the issue in The New York Times and two Seattle-based newspapers.
Starbucks said that trademarks were not the best way to help growers and suggested a regional certification alternative that it said was used in many countries to brand premium food and wine. It made no sense, the company said, for trademarks to be geographically based, as in the Ethiopian application for three regional names. Starbucks added that it consistently paid premium bean prices and that between 2002 and 2006 it had quadrupled its Ethiopian coffee purchases.
“We support the recognition of the source of our coffees and have a deep appreciation for the farmers that grow them,” the company said. “We are committed to working collaboratively and continuing dialogue with key stakeholders to find a solution that benefits Ethiopian coffee farmers. We have had recent conversations with Oxfam about planning logistics for a stakeholder summit.
“Our investment in social development projects and providing access to affordable loans . . . has been recognised for its leadership within the industry,” it said.
Getachew Mengistie, the director-general of the Ethiopian Intellectual Property Office, said that Addis Ababa had studied the merits of both trademarks and certification and found that trademarks would strengthen the position of farmers, enabling them to get a reasonable return for their product.
Professor Holt said: “With a certification mark, Starbucks and other Western coffee marketers would still have full control over Ethiopian coffee brands.” Trademarks would require licences for companies wanting to use the names — giving the coffee producers a commercial asset that they could control.
Starbucks declined to confirm or deny Mr Donald’s visit. Oxfam said that it had invited supporters to fax Mr Donald in protest and that more than 70,000 people had done so.
“Speciality coffees in other regions of the world can get up to 45 per cent of the retail price, compared with the 5 to 10 per cent Ethiopians are currently receiving,” Oxfam said. “We’re meeting with Starbucks again next week and are hoping there can be progress.” Ethiopia’s growers could earn $88 million (£45 million) more per year with trademarks, it said.
Starbucks declined to respond directly to Professor Holt’s comments.
Brian Smith, research fellow at Cranfield University and author of Guarding the Brand, questioned Professor Holt’s assertions. He said that Western consumers had limited sympathy with subsistence farmers in Africa and although they might be prepared to pay 5p more for a fair trade latte, they might not walk an extra 50 yards to another coffee shop to avoid Starbucks and its policy on trademarks.
“I don’t see this doing Starbucks significant long-lasting harm . . . Starbucks will handle this in an intelligent manner, offering an alternative,” he said.
Crucial brew
$11.2bn
Ethiopia’s GDP
$7.8bn
Starbucks’ annual revenues
12,400
Number of Starbucks coffee shops worldwide
15 million
Number of Ethiopians reliant on the coffee trade
54%
Percentage of Ethiopia’s GDP that is coffee
90%
Percentage of Ethiopia’s exports that are coffee
80%
Perecentage of Ethiopians living on $2 or less a day
Source: The Times
Academic warns American chain that customers will go elsewhere if it places profit before ethics
Starbucks was accused yesterday of “playing Russian roulette” with its brand as a row over prices for Ethiopian coffee farmers intensified.
As an Oxford academic lambasted the American coffee shops chain, Jim Donald, Starbucks’ chief executive, was preparing to visit Ethiopia tomorrow for talks with Meles Zenawi, its Prime Minister, The Times has learnt.
Douglas Holt, the L’Oréal Professor of Marketing at Oxford University’s Saïd Business School, accused Starbucks of hypocrisy and abuse of power and said that the company was in danger of damaging its name among its educated middle-class customers by opposing Addis Ababa’s attempts to trademark Ethiopia’s coffee varieties in the United States.
The international coffee chain had worked hard to cultivate a progressive image, selling fair trade and “ethical” products and promoting sustainable development among the poorest coffee-growers, he said.
“In their rash attempt to shut down Ethiopia’s applications, [Starbucks] have placed the Starbucks brand in significant peril. Starbucks customers will be shocked by the disconnect between their current perceptions of Starbucks’ ethics and the company’s actions against Ethiopia,” he said.
He claimed that Starbucks’ stance was likely to hit profits much harder than any price rises brought about by trademarking.
Oxfam said last month that the Ethiopian growers selling to Starbucks earned between 75 cents and $1.60 a pound on beans that Starbucks sold at up to $26 (£13.40) a pound. The aid organisation issued a strongly worded statement accusing Starbucks of actively blocking Ethiopia’s trademark bid.
Starbucks, in turn, denied this and issued a statement demanding that Oxfam stop its attack. Oxfam took out full-page advertisements on the issue in The New York Times and two Seattle-based newspapers.
Starbucks said that trademarks were not the best way to help growers and suggested a regional certification alternative that it said was used in many countries to brand premium food and wine. It made no sense, the company said, for trademarks to be geographically based, as in the Ethiopian application for three regional names. Starbucks added that it consistently paid premium bean prices and that between 2002 and 2006 it had quadrupled its Ethiopian coffee purchases.
“We support the recognition of the source of our coffees and have a deep appreciation for the farmers that grow them,” the company said. “We are committed to working collaboratively and continuing dialogue with key stakeholders to find a solution that benefits Ethiopian coffee farmers. We have had recent conversations with Oxfam about planning logistics for a stakeholder summit.
“Our investment in social development projects and providing access to affordable loans . . . has been recognised for its leadership within the industry,” it said.
Getachew Mengistie, the director-general of the Ethiopian Intellectual Property Office, said that Addis Ababa had studied the merits of both trademarks and certification and found that trademarks would strengthen the position of farmers, enabling them to get a reasonable return for their product.
Professor Holt said: “With a certification mark, Starbucks and other Western coffee marketers would still have full control over Ethiopian coffee brands.” Trademarks would require licences for companies wanting to use the names — giving the coffee producers a commercial asset that they could control.
Starbucks declined to confirm or deny Mr Donald’s visit. Oxfam said that it had invited supporters to fax Mr Donald in protest and that more than 70,000 people had done so.
“Speciality coffees in other regions of the world can get up to 45 per cent of the retail price, compared with the 5 to 10 per cent Ethiopians are currently receiving,” Oxfam said. “We’re meeting with Starbucks again next week and are hoping there can be progress.” Ethiopia’s growers could earn $88 million (£45 million) more per year with trademarks, it said.
Starbucks declined to respond directly to Professor Holt’s comments.
Brian Smith, research fellow at Cranfield University and author of Guarding the Brand, questioned Professor Holt’s assertions. He said that Western consumers had limited sympathy with subsistence farmers in Africa and although they might be prepared to pay 5p more for a fair trade latte, they might not walk an extra 50 yards to another coffee shop to avoid Starbucks and its policy on trademarks.
“I don’t see this doing Starbucks significant long-lasting harm . . . Starbucks will handle this in an intelligent manner, offering an alternative,” he said.
Crucial brew
$11.2bn
Ethiopia’s GDP
$7.8bn
Starbucks’ annual revenues
12,400
Number of Starbucks coffee shops worldwide
15 million
Number of Ethiopians reliant on the coffee trade
54%
Percentage of Ethiopia’s GDP that is coffee
90%
Percentage of Ethiopia’s exports that are coffee
80%
Perecentage of Ethiopians living on $2 or less a day
Source: The Times
Starbucks 'blocks' Ethiopian coffee bid (Reuters)
Starbucks has been accused of preventing Ethiopia from trademarking its coffee, denying farmers potential income of about $94 million.
The Seattle company denies any wrongdoing
Oxfam, a British charity, said on Tuesday that the US coffee shop giant, which had a turnover of $7.8 billion in the year to October 1, prevented Ethiopia from securing trademark protection for two of its best-known beans, Sidamo and Harar.
Had Ethiopia been successful, it would have allowed the impoverished country to control the use of the beans in the market, giving its farmers a bigger share of the retail price, the charity said.
Ethiopia's foreign ministry said in a statement: "Securing the trademark for its Sidamo, Harar and Yirgacheffe coffee beans could have allowed the country to increase its negotiation leverage through control of the names and ultimately drive a greater share of the retail price in the global market."
Starbucks denied being behind the blocking bid by the US National Coffee Association (NCA) at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
"We have not been involved in trying to block Ethiopia's attempts. We did not get the NCA involved - in fact it was the other way around. They were the ones who contacted us on this," the company's Dub Hay told BBC radio.
Blocking action
NCA head, Robert Nelson backed Hay, Starbucks' senior vice-president in charge of procurement, telling the programme the NCA was contacted by a third party.
But Oxfam said it believed Starbucks was the instigator of the blocking action.
"We have heard from a number of sources that actually Starbucks was involved in alerting the US coffee association to block these applications," the charity's Jo Leadbetter said.
It "stinks of corporate bullying" she told the BBC.
Licensing agreements
The charity said Starbucks and other coffee companies should sign voluntary licensing agreements to acknowledge Ethiopia's ownership of the coffee names, regardless of whether trademark protection has been issued.
"Coffee shops can sell Sidamo and Harar coffees for up to GBP14 a pound because of the beans' specialty status," said Tadesse Maskela, head of the Oromia Coffee Farmers Cooperative Union in Ethiopia.
"But Ethiopian coffee farmers only earn between 30p and 59p [per pound] for their crop, barely enough to cover the cost of production," Maskela said in a statement.
Girma Balcha, head of biodiversity at Ethiopia's ministry of agriculture and rural development, said Starbucks' use of Ethiopian coffee names without his government's prior consent violated the International Convention on Biodiversity.
"In the absence of such an agreement, Starbucks has no legal background to use Ethiopian coffee names as a brand to enhance its coffee business," Girma told reporters in Addis Ababa.
Source: Al Jazeera
The Seattle company denies any wrongdoing
Oxfam, a British charity, said on Tuesday that the US coffee shop giant, which had a turnover of $7.8 billion in the year to October 1, prevented Ethiopia from securing trademark protection for two of its best-known beans, Sidamo and Harar.
Had Ethiopia been successful, it would have allowed the impoverished country to control the use of the beans in the market, giving its farmers a bigger share of the retail price, the charity said.
Ethiopia's foreign ministry said in a statement: "Securing the trademark for its Sidamo, Harar and Yirgacheffe coffee beans could have allowed the country to increase its negotiation leverage through control of the names and ultimately drive a greater share of the retail price in the global market."
Starbucks denied being behind the blocking bid by the US National Coffee Association (NCA) at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
"We have not been involved in trying to block Ethiopia's attempts. We did not get the NCA involved - in fact it was the other way around. They were the ones who contacted us on this," the company's Dub Hay told BBC radio.
Blocking action
NCA head, Robert Nelson backed Hay, Starbucks' senior vice-president in charge of procurement, telling the programme the NCA was contacted by a third party.
But Oxfam said it believed Starbucks was the instigator of the blocking action.
"We have heard from a number of sources that actually Starbucks was involved in alerting the US coffee association to block these applications," the charity's Jo Leadbetter said.
It "stinks of corporate bullying" she told the BBC.
Licensing agreements
The charity said Starbucks and other coffee companies should sign voluntary licensing agreements to acknowledge Ethiopia's ownership of the coffee names, regardless of whether trademark protection has been issued.
"Coffee shops can sell Sidamo and Harar coffees for up to GBP14 a pound because of the beans' specialty status," said Tadesse Maskela, head of the Oromia Coffee Farmers Cooperative Union in Ethiopia.
"But Ethiopian coffee farmers only earn between 30p and 59p [per pound] for their crop, barely enough to cover the cost of production," Maskela said in a statement.
Girma Balcha, head of biodiversity at Ethiopia's ministry of agriculture and rural development, said Starbucks' use of Ethiopian coffee names without his government's prior consent violated the International Convention on Biodiversity.
"In the absence of such an agreement, Starbucks has no legal background to use Ethiopian coffee names as a brand to enhance its coffee business," Girma told reporters in Addis Ababa.
Source: Al Jazeera
Global Day of Action Against Starbucks (Starbucks Union)
Starbucks Workers Demand the Right to Organize!
This November 24th-25th, stand in solidarity with Starbucks workers as we call for an end to the anti-union campaign waged by Starbucks and for the reinstatement of all unlawfully fired workers. In addition we are calling on Starbucks to give Ethiopia control over its coffee.
Starbucks workers around the country and the world are organizing to make our jobs better and finally have a real, independent voice at work. A powerful voice that our managers, even the whole company, have no choice but to listen too. By organizing a union baristas in NYC and Chicago have seen our wages increased, schedules stabilized and respect from our bosses. Over the last two years, however, Starbucks has consistently responded to workers organizing with harassment, intimidation and illegal firings. A National Labor Relations Board settlement was reached in March of 2006 that reinstated two workers and forced Starbucks to pay back wages and change discriminatory policies. The Settlement did little to stop the anti-union campaign and since December of 2005 five workers in NYC were unlawfully fired for engaging in protected union activity.
Joseph Agins fired from Starbucks at 2nd ave and 9th, December 12th 2005
Charles Fostrom fired from Starbucks at 57th and Lexington, July 11th 2006
Evan Winterscheidt fired from Starbucks at 14th and 6th ave, July 18th 2006
Daniel Gross fired from Starbucks at 36th and Madison, August 5th 2006
Isis Saenz fired from Starbucks at 57th and Lexington, November 1st 2006
The IWW Starbucks workers union is calling for action. On November 24th-25th union members and supporters will be taking action to demand reinstatement of all five fired workers and an end to the Anti-union campaign.
The IWW Starbucks Workers Union is building solidarity across the coffee industry. We are calling on Starbucks to sign an agreement that acknowledges Ethiopia's ownership of its coffee names. Securing the rights to names such as Sidamo, Harar and Yirgacheffe would enable Ethiopia's coffee industry and farmers to earn an additional $88 million per year.
* Coffee makes up 40-50% of Ethiopia's export income;
* 15 million Ethiopians are dependent on the coffee trade;
* One in four people live on less than $1 a day and 80% of its people live on less than $2 a day; and
* Ethiopia ranks in the bottom 10 of the UN human development index of income, health and education.
If Starbucks is genuine in its commitment to farmers it will sign the licensing agreement Ethiopia has offered.
For more info visit starbucksunion.org
To get involved in your area please contact:
Eastern US: Tomer (646) 753-1167 Tomer.IWW@gmail.com
Midwest: Joe - (815) 545-5273 unionmadelattes@gmail.com
Western US: Johannah - (646) 541-8921 rebelgurley@yahoo.com
Bookmark/Search this post with:
Trackback URL for this post:
http://www.starbucksunion.org/trackback/1109
This November 24th-25th, stand in solidarity with Starbucks workers as we call for an end to the anti-union campaign waged by Starbucks and for the reinstatement of all unlawfully fired workers. In addition we are calling on Starbucks to give Ethiopia control over its coffee.
Starbucks workers around the country and the world are organizing to make our jobs better and finally have a real, independent voice at work. A powerful voice that our managers, even the whole company, have no choice but to listen too. By organizing a union baristas in NYC and Chicago have seen our wages increased, schedules stabilized and respect from our bosses. Over the last two years, however, Starbucks has consistently responded to workers organizing with harassment, intimidation and illegal firings. A National Labor Relations Board settlement was reached in March of 2006 that reinstated two workers and forced Starbucks to pay back wages and change discriminatory policies. The Settlement did little to stop the anti-union campaign and since December of 2005 five workers in NYC were unlawfully fired for engaging in protected union activity.
Joseph Agins fired from Starbucks at 2nd ave and 9th, December 12th 2005
Charles Fostrom fired from Starbucks at 57th and Lexington, July 11th 2006
Evan Winterscheidt fired from Starbucks at 14th and 6th ave, July 18th 2006
Daniel Gross fired from Starbucks at 36th and Madison, August 5th 2006
Isis Saenz fired from Starbucks at 57th and Lexington, November 1st 2006
The IWW Starbucks workers union is calling for action. On November 24th-25th union members and supporters will be taking action to demand reinstatement of all five fired workers and an end to the Anti-union campaign.
The IWW Starbucks Workers Union is building solidarity across the coffee industry. We are calling on Starbucks to sign an agreement that acknowledges Ethiopia's ownership of its coffee names. Securing the rights to names such as Sidamo, Harar and Yirgacheffe would enable Ethiopia's coffee industry and farmers to earn an additional $88 million per year.
* Coffee makes up 40-50% of Ethiopia's export income;
* 15 million Ethiopians are dependent on the coffee trade;
* One in four people live on less than $1 a day and 80% of its people live on less than $2 a day; and
* Ethiopia ranks in the bottom 10 of the UN human development index of income, health and education.
If Starbucks is genuine in its commitment to farmers it will sign the licensing agreement Ethiopia has offered.
For more info visit starbucksunion.org
To get involved in your area please contact:
Eastern US: Tomer (646) 753-1167 Tomer.IWW@gmail.com
Midwest: Joe - (815) 545-5273 unionmadelattes@gmail.com
Western US: Johannah - (646) 541-8921 rebelgurley@yahoo.com
Bookmark/Search this post with:
Trackback URL for this post:
http://www.starbucksunion.org/trackback/1109
Ethiopia is the birthplace of coffee : A Brief History
The Legend of Kaldi
Once upon a time, in a faraway land called Ethiopia —or maybe Abyssinia, it was a very long time ago, after all— there lived a young goatherd named Kaldi.
By all accounts (and there are many, as the story has been retold many, many times) Kaldi was a very responsible young man, and not one to do foolish things. Every day Kaldi would set his goats to grazing in the hills that surrounded his village, and every evening his loyal goats would return home. This, of course, would suggest that the goats were the responsible parties. How foolish is it, after all, to just turn your goats loose into the hills every morning? But, back to our story...
One evening, Kaldi's goats did not return home. The young man, no doubt feeling a little foolish by now, searched for his herd all through the night, and as morning broke he found them, leaping and dancing with reckless abandon and apparent glee round a stand of shiny, dark-leafed shrubs with bright red berries. Kaldi took in the scene before him, amazed. He soon decided it must be the berries that caused such reckless behavior in his otherwise responsible goats, and — forgetting everything his mother told him about eating strange foods from strange places — Kaldi sampled the berries, himself. In no time, he too was dancing gleefully with his goats around the green-leafed shrubs.
Soon, we are told, a wise and learned man passed by —an imam, or monk— trudging sleepily on his way to prayer. The imam rubbed his eyes and took in the scene before him —Kaldi and his goats— dancing gleefully about a stand of shiny, dark-leafed shrubs with bright red berries.
Being both a curious and learned man, the imam gathered some of these berries, himself, and on returning home he studied them. In his experiments with the bright red berries, he roasted them, boiled them and sampled the resulting beverage. He shared what he found with the rest of his fellow monks, and soon none fell asleep at prayers! And so coffee spread from place to place, creating a more gleeful, and wakeful, world.
So what of Kaldi? Perhaps he and his goats are dancing, still.
Source: Green Mountain Coffee Roasters
Once upon a time, in a faraway land called Ethiopia —or maybe Abyssinia, it was a very long time ago, after all— there lived a young goatherd named Kaldi.
By all accounts (and there are many, as the story has been retold many, many times) Kaldi was a very responsible young man, and not one to do foolish things. Every day Kaldi would set his goats to grazing in the hills that surrounded his village, and every evening his loyal goats would return home. This, of course, would suggest that the goats were the responsible parties. How foolish is it, after all, to just turn your goats loose into the hills every morning? But, back to our story...
One evening, Kaldi's goats did not return home. The young man, no doubt feeling a little foolish by now, searched for his herd all through the night, and as morning broke he found them, leaping and dancing with reckless abandon and apparent glee round a stand of shiny, dark-leafed shrubs with bright red berries. Kaldi took in the scene before him, amazed. He soon decided it must be the berries that caused such reckless behavior in his otherwise responsible goats, and — forgetting everything his mother told him about eating strange foods from strange places — Kaldi sampled the berries, himself. In no time, he too was dancing gleefully with his goats around the green-leafed shrubs.
Soon, we are told, a wise and learned man passed by —an imam, or monk— trudging sleepily on his way to prayer. The imam rubbed his eyes and took in the scene before him —Kaldi and his goats— dancing gleefully about a stand of shiny, dark-leafed shrubs with bright red berries.
Being both a curious and learned man, the imam gathered some of these berries, himself, and on returning home he studied them. In his experiments with the bright red berries, he roasted them, boiled them and sampled the resulting beverage. He shared what he found with the rest of his fellow monks, and soon none fell asleep at prayers! And so coffee spread from place to place, creating a more gleeful, and wakeful, world.
So what of Kaldi? Perhaps he and his goats are dancing, still.
Source: Green Mountain Coffee Roasters
Review: Black Gold
Posted Nov 9th 2006 3:32PM by Jeffrey M. Anderson
Filed under: Documentary, New Releases, Theatrical Reviews
I love coffee. And I'm not talking about your double-half-caff-latte-with-a-twist. I'm talking black coffee, nothing in it. Why drown the taste with sugar and cream? Isn't that like dumping ice cubes in your Pinot Noir? I've been grinding my own beans and brewing my own coffee for years. I know which brands I like, and I try to buy 'Fair Trade' when I can. But ultimately what I really know about coffee could only fill about half a cup.
That's where the new documentary Black Gold, now in limited release, comes in. First-time filmmakers (and brothers) Marc and Nick Francis travel the world over to capture images of coffee plantations, coffee farmers and loving hands carefully caressing piles of unroasted beans. But if this were merely a documentary about the process of bean fields-to-Starbucks, it wouldn't be playing in theaters. No, Black Gold is actually the year's 1000th passive political documentary about how horrible the world is. In Ethiopia, where some of the the finest coffee in the world is harvested, farmers get the equivalent of pennies per sack, whereas, halfway around the world, Westerners pay up to three dollars per cup. Fortunately the film didn't make me feel guilty enough to give up coffee, and it does offer a small, simple response -- if not a solution -- available to nearly anyone in this country.
With Black Gold, the brothers reveal an inquisitive filmic style, exploring and following characters rather than grilling them with interview questions. And, like the best documentaries, they have found a compelling lead character with Tadesse Meskela, who in Ethiopia represents a giant co-op, encompassing 74 farms and over 70,000 farmers. Meskela travels all over, from London to Seattle and New York (where the coffee prices are set) inspecting sacks of beans and meeting with potential buyers. In one heartbreaking scene, he visits a typical supermarket, trying to find at least one bag of coffee that was grown by his farmers. The film presents Meskela as a likable, passionate, highly educated fellow; at home, his wife praises his dedication and complains about his constant absence.
In another subplot, the Francis brothers show how many farmers are giving up coffee growing altogether, simply because they can no longer feed their families on the meager profits. Rather, they are using their land to grow chat, a narcotic plant whose leaves, when chewed, give off a euphoric effect. The film shows a "chat" market from the window of a moving car, making it look as sad and as hopeless as a corner drug deal on some graffiti-smeared street in the U.S.
Despite all this, the filmmakers only present a one-sided story, assuming that corporations are evil without doing the legwork to find out why and how. (They never interview any CEOs.) They sprinkle their film with random, loaded images of rich white people leisurely sipping their cups of coffee, presumably ignorant about where it came from and how little the workers are being paid. We also get a horrifying "tour" of the original Starbucks coffee house in Seattle, conducted by two chirpy young women who express delighted awe at being part of such a powerful empire. (In a leaked memo, a Starbucks VP has since accused the filmmakers of inaccuracy.)
Still, Black Gold is a beautifully made film that takes time to observe the beauties (and horrors) of its world. It prefers the natural rhythm of conversation, complete with pauses, stops and starts. It appears to invite the viewer in rather than demanding that the viewer pay attention. Best of all, this informative film suggests a plan of action: coffee consumers can help by buying only fair trade goods, or by seeking out coffee from Ethiopia (Whole Foods apparently sells it). Thereby we get the benefit of taste, and they get the benefit of a living wage.
Source: Cinematical
Filed under: Documentary, New Releases, Theatrical Reviews
I love coffee. And I'm not talking about your double-half-caff-latte-with-a-twist. I'm talking black coffee, nothing in it. Why drown the taste with sugar and cream? Isn't that like dumping ice cubes in your Pinot Noir? I've been grinding my own beans and brewing my own coffee for years. I know which brands I like, and I try to buy 'Fair Trade' when I can. But ultimately what I really know about coffee could only fill about half a cup.
That's where the new documentary Black Gold, now in limited release, comes in. First-time filmmakers (and brothers) Marc and Nick Francis travel the world over to capture images of coffee plantations, coffee farmers and loving hands carefully caressing piles of unroasted beans. But if this were merely a documentary about the process of bean fields-to-Starbucks, it wouldn't be playing in theaters. No, Black Gold is actually the year's 1000th passive political documentary about how horrible the world is. In Ethiopia, where some of the the finest coffee in the world is harvested, farmers get the equivalent of pennies per sack, whereas, halfway around the world, Westerners pay up to three dollars per cup. Fortunately the film didn't make me feel guilty enough to give up coffee, and it does offer a small, simple response -- if not a solution -- available to nearly anyone in this country.
With Black Gold, the brothers reveal an inquisitive filmic style, exploring and following characters rather than grilling them with interview questions. And, like the best documentaries, they have found a compelling lead character with Tadesse Meskela, who in Ethiopia represents a giant co-op, encompassing 74 farms and over 70,000 farmers. Meskela travels all over, from London to Seattle and New York (where the coffee prices are set) inspecting sacks of beans and meeting with potential buyers. In one heartbreaking scene, he visits a typical supermarket, trying to find at least one bag of coffee that was grown by his farmers. The film presents Meskela as a likable, passionate, highly educated fellow; at home, his wife praises his dedication and complains about his constant absence.
In another subplot, the Francis brothers show how many farmers are giving up coffee growing altogether, simply because they can no longer feed their families on the meager profits. Rather, they are using their land to grow chat, a narcotic plant whose leaves, when chewed, give off a euphoric effect. The film shows a "chat" market from the window of a moving car, making it look as sad and as hopeless as a corner drug deal on some graffiti-smeared street in the U.S.
Despite all this, the filmmakers only present a one-sided story, assuming that corporations are evil without doing the legwork to find out why and how. (They never interview any CEOs.) They sprinkle their film with random, loaded images of rich white people leisurely sipping their cups of coffee, presumably ignorant about where it came from and how little the workers are being paid. We also get a horrifying "tour" of the original Starbucks coffee house in Seattle, conducted by two chirpy young women who express delighted awe at being part of such a powerful empire. (In a leaked memo, a Starbucks VP has since accused the filmmakers of inaccuracy.)
Still, Black Gold is a beautifully made film that takes time to observe the beauties (and horrors) of its world. It prefers the natural rhythm of conversation, complete with pauses, stops and starts. It appears to invite the viewer in rather than demanding that the viewer pay attention. Best of all, this informative film suggests a plan of action: coffee consumers can help by buying only fair trade goods, or by seeking out coffee from Ethiopia (Whole Foods apparently sells it). Thereby we get the benefit of taste, and they get the benefit of a living wage.
Source: Cinematical
What’s in a name? Plenty, Ethiopia tells Starbucks
By Brenda Ryan
Published Nov 9, 2006 8:02 PM
How does the “free trade” pushed by U.S. corporations really work?
Ethiopian coffee farmers don’t make enough in one whole day to buy a latte at Starbucks. But the Ethiopian government has a plan to change that. It’s seeking trademarks on Ethiopia’s famous coffee names in hopes of getting a larger share of their retail price. The charity group Oxfam estimates that the trademarks could bring the Ethiopian coffee industry and farmers an additional $88 million per year.
Starbucks, though, is standing in the way.
Last year the Ethiopian government filed applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to trademark the Sidamo, Harar and Yirgacheffe coffee names. While Ethiopia received a trademark for Yirgacheffe in August, the National Coffee Association and Starbucks are opposing registration of the other two names.
“Coffee shops can sell Sidamo and Harar coffees for up to $26 a pound because of the beans’ specialty status,” Tadesse Meskela, head of the Oromia Coffee Farmers Cooperative Union, said in an Oct. 26 Oxfam press release. “But Ethiopian coffee farmers only earn between 60 cents to $1.10 for their crop, barely enough to cover the cost of production. I think most people would see that as an injustice.”
U.S. corporations are fiercely protective of what they regard as their intellectual property. Patents on AIDS drugs have prevented the people of Africa from obtaining low-cost versions of the medicines. But when it comes to the resources of poor countries, they have a double standard.
Starbucks is calling on Ethiopia to register the coffee names as geographic indicators–names given to indicate the specific place where a food, wine or spirit comes from. The PTO has registered more than 100 geographic indications, including Darjeeling for tea cultivated in Darjeeling, India. Once someone receives a registration, only products produced in that region may carry the geographic name.
Starbucks said in a press release that geographic certification systems “are far more effective than registering trademarks for geographically descriptive terms, which is actually contrary to general trademark law and custom.”
That’s not what Starbucks was saying two years ago when it tried to trademark one of Ethiopia’s coffee names. In 2004 it filed an application to register “Shirkina Sun-Dried Sidamo” as a trademark. According to PTO’s website, the application was abandoned in July. The Guardian reported Oct. 26 that the PTO had rejected Ethiopia’s application because the word “Sidamo” was already in Starbucks’ application. The article says that once Starbucks’ application became inactive, the National Coffee Association opposed Ethiopia’s application at the request of Starbucks. The NCA and Starbucks both denied that the firm asked the association to intervene.
Light Years IP, a non-profit group that seeks to alleviate poverty by helping producers in developing countries gain ownership of their intellectual property and use it to increase their export income, has been helping the Ethiopian government register trademarks for Harar, Sidamo and Yirgacheffe.
While these gourmet coffees are sold at a premium price at stores like Starbucks, Ethiopia is exporting them at prices close to those of commodity coffee. “Ethiopia receives only around 6 percent of the retail price their fine coffees earn in foreign markets,” Light Years IP says on its Web site. “In comparison, producers of Jamaican Blue Mountain Coffee capture 45 percent of their product’s retail price.”
Light Years IP says Ethiopia has already been granted trademarks in more than 30 countries and plans to license the coffee names to individual companies around the world free of charge. Now that’s a deal you’re not likely to see at Starbucks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php
Published Nov 9, 2006 8:02 PM
How does the “free trade” pushed by U.S. corporations really work?
Ethiopian coffee farmers don’t make enough in one whole day to buy a latte at Starbucks. But the Ethiopian government has a plan to change that. It’s seeking trademarks on Ethiopia’s famous coffee names in hopes of getting a larger share of their retail price. The charity group Oxfam estimates that the trademarks could bring the Ethiopian coffee industry and farmers an additional $88 million per year.
Starbucks, though, is standing in the way.
Last year the Ethiopian government filed applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to trademark the Sidamo, Harar and Yirgacheffe coffee names. While Ethiopia received a trademark for Yirgacheffe in August, the National Coffee Association and Starbucks are opposing registration of the other two names.
“Coffee shops can sell Sidamo and Harar coffees for up to $26 a pound because of the beans’ specialty status,” Tadesse Meskela, head of the Oromia Coffee Farmers Cooperative Union, said in an Oct. 26 Oxfam press release. “But Ethiopian coffee farmers only earn between 60 cents to $1.10 for their crop, barely enough to cover the cost of production. I think most people would see that as an injustice.”
U.S. corporations are fiercely protective of what they regard as their intellectual property. Patents on AIDS drugs have prevented the people of Africa from obtaining low-cost versions of the medicines. But when it comes to the resources of poor countries, they have a double standard.
Starbucks is calling on Ethiopia to register the coffee names as geographic indicators–names given to indicate the specific place where a food, wine or spirit comes from. The PTO has registered more than 100 geographic indications, including Darjeeling for tea cultivated in Darjeeling, India. Once someone receives a registration, only products produced in that region may carry the geographic name.
Starbucks said in a press release that geographic certification systems “are far more effective than registering trademarks for geographically descriptive terms, which is actually contrary to general trademark law and custom.”
That’s not what Starbucks was saying two years ago when it tried to trademark one of Ethiopia’s coffee names. In 2004 it filed an application to register “Shirkina Sun-Dried Sidamo” as a trademark. According to PTO’s website, the application was abandoned in July. The Guardian reported Oct. 26 that the PTO had rejected Ethiopia’s application because the word “Sidamo” was already in Starbucks’ application. The article says that once Starbucks’ application became inactive, the National Coffee Association opposed Ethiopia’s application at the request of Starbucks. The NCA and Starbucks both denied that the firm asked the association to intervene.
Light Years IP, a non-profit group that seeks to alleviate poverty by helping producers in developing countries gain ownership of their intellectual property and use it to increase their export income, has been helping the Ethiopian government register trademarks for Harar, Sidamo and Yirgacheffe.
While these gourmet coffees are sold at a premium price at stores like Starbucks, Ethiopia is exporting them at prices close to those of commodity coffee. “Ethiopia receives only around 6 percent of the retail price their fine coffees earn in foreign markets,” Light Years IP says on its Web site. “In comparison, producers of Jamaican Blue Mountain Coffee capture 45 percent of their product’s retail price.”
Light Years IP says Ethiopia has already been granted trademarks in more than 30 countries and plans to license the coffee names to individual companies around the world free of charge. Now that’s a deal you’re not likely to see at Starbucks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)